<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: An Inspiring Community Campaign: The East London Waterworks Park	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://livinglondonhistory.com/an-inspiring-community-campaign-the-east-london-waterworks-park/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://livinglondonhistory.com/an-inspiring-community-campaign-the-east-london-waterworks-park/?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=an-inspiring-community-campaign-the-east-london-waterworks-park</link>
	<description>A blog sharing London&#039;s curiosities, hidden gems and historical walks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 13:30:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Is East London Finally Getting a Free Nature Oasis for Swimmers? - First Time in London		</title>
		<link>https://livinglondonhistory.com/an-inspiring-community-campaign-the-east-london-waterworks-park/#comment-2441</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Is East London Finally Getting a Free Nature Oasis for Swimmers? - First Time in London]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2026 13:30:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://livinglondonhistory.com/?p=247957#comment-2441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] Park plans have faced opposition from government officials who proposed using the site for a secure children&#8217;s home instead. While Sea Lanes has secured approval and has a defined timeline, the Waterworks Park [&#8230;]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Park plans have faced opposition from government officials who proposed using the site for a secure children&#8217;s home instead. While Sea Lanes has secured approval and has a defined timeline, the Waterworks Park [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Ridley		</title>
		<link>https://livinglondonhistory.com/an-inspiring-community-campaign-the-east-london-waterworks-park/#comment-2148</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Ridley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 11:42:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://livinglondonhistory.com/?p=247957#comment-2148</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[An inspirational project , and I doubt whether Nimbyism has played a part re the children&#039;s home decision given the information you provide here.
That is not to say I don&#039;t care about the children,  BTW!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An inspirational project , and I doubt whether Nimbyism has played a part re the children&#8217;s home decision given the information you provide here.<br />
That is not to say I don&#8217;t care about the children,  BTW!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: chesherj		</title>
		<link>https://livinglondonhistory.com/an-inspiring-community-campaign-the-east-london-waterworks-park/#comment-2146</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chesherj]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 07:56:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://livinglondonhistory.com/?p=247957#comment-2146</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://livinglondonhistory.com/an-inspiring-community-campaign-the-east-london-waterworks-park/#comment-2145&quot;&gt;Martin Le Jeune&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi Martin, they talk a bit about this on their FAQ&#039;s page on their website: https://www.elwp.org.uk/FAQ.htm. I think the argument is that this site specifically has a unique opportunity to link up other green spaces, it is actually not that suitable to build new buildings on and is Metropolitan Open Land. This project could not be carried out somewhere else whereas a different project, like a home, could. They will also be providing lots of other benefits to children of the community through learning, recreation, a forest school etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://livinglondonhistory.com/an-inspiring-community-campaign-the-east-london-waterworks-park/#comment-2145">Martin Le Jeune</a>.</p>
<p>Hi Martin, they talk a bit about this on their FAQ&#8217;s page on their website: <a href="https://www.elwp.org.uk/FAQ.htm" rel="nofollow ugc">https://www.elwp.org.uk/FAQ.htm</a>. I think the argument is that this site specifically has a unique opportunity to link up other green spaces, it is actually not that suitable to build new buildings on and is Metropolitan Open Land. This project could not be carried out somewhere else whereas a different project, like a home, could. They will also be providing lots of other benefits to children of the community through learning, recreation, a forest school etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Martin Le Jeune		</title>
		<link>https://livinglondonhistory.com/an-inspiring-community-campaign-the-east-london-waterworks-park/#comment-2145</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Martin Le Jeune]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2025 05:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://livinglondonhistory.com/?p=247957#comment-2145</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Buried in your piece is opposition to a secure children&#039;s home on the site. I have a nasty suspicion that this is driven by NIMBYism. What a shame that campaigners can’t realise that these children need care and proper facilities. No reason why part of the site can’t be used for that as well as the nature park they envisage, surely?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buried in your piece is opposition to a secure children&#8217;s home on the site. I have a nasty suspicion that this is driven by NIMBYism. What a shame that campaigners can’t realise that these children need care and proper facilities. No reason why part of the site can’t be used for that as well as the nature park they envisage, surely?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
